ProWorkflow vs Harvest

Harvest is a powerful time tracking tool with a simple and efficient interface, but it lacks key features that modern teams need. Here is why teams are switching:

• Lack of project tracking features – Harvest excels as an invoicing and time tracking tool, but lacks advanced project management tools like task dependencies, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, or detailed workflows.
• No built-in resource management – You can track time spent against tasks, but can’t manage those tasks, assign subtasks, or create detailed project hierarchies within Harvest.
• Basic reporting capabilities – While Harvest has decent time and expense reporting features, it lacks deeper analytics like project profitability at the task level, resource forecasting, or custom dashboards.
• Scalability challenges – Larger and remote teams that need advanced user permission settings, cross-project views, or internal team collaboration tools may struggle with Harvest’s simplicity.
• Cost vs. value – Some users feel that Harvest becomes expensive once additional tools are required to fill the gaps (e.g., Asana + Harvest + Invoicing = multiple subscriptions). All-in-one platforms like ProWorkflow offer better value.
• Dependence on integrations – Harvest relies heavily on third-party tools for features like task management, quoting, file sharing, and CRM.